Explore Electrification Academy — your go-to hub for expert knowledge, guides, and resources on battery technology & electrification.
When we talk about breakthroughs in the battery industry, the conversation almost always starts — and ends — with chemistry.
New cathode materials. Silicon anodes. Solid-state promises. Nanomaterials. 😉
When is there a chemistry that we can fast charge in 5 min? 😅
And while chemistry absolutely matters, I’ve seen again and again in my professional career and consulting work: innovation doesn’t only happen at the materials level. It also happens at the level of integration, control, and how we actually use the battery we already have.
One of the most interesting examples lately came from my partnership with Iontra, Inc. a company focused not on changing what batteries are made of — but on HOW they are CHARGED.
“Fast charging” has become one of the defining topics in battery technology. We all want it — whether we’re talking about EVs, consumer electronics, or industrial tools.
At the same time, we also all know the trade-offs in conventional lithium-ion batteries:
Faster charging accelerates aging
It increases the risk of lithium plating and dendrite growth (which is a safety riks)
It worsens cold-temperature performance
It reduces cycle life and long-term reliability
As EV owners, we’re told to adapt our behavior: charge slower in winter, avoid fast chargers when possible, don’t charge to 100%.
But that only addresses one side of the problem.
The other side is how intelligently the battery is being charged in the first place.
Most lithium-ion batteries today are charged using a relatively blunt but well-established approach: constant current, constant voltage (CC–CV).
In simple terms, the battery is charged at a fixed current until it reaches a defined voltage limit. Once that threshold is reached, the control strategy switches — the voltage is held constant while the current gradually tapers off. This method is straightforward, robust, and easy to standardize, which is why it has become the industry default.
However, CC–CV also rests on a major assumption: that battery cells behave in a predictable, uniform, and static way.
In reality, they do not.
Cells vary — not only by chemistry, but by design, manufacturing spread, aging state, temperature, and usage history. Yet CC–CV applies the same charging logic regardless of how an individual cell actually responds during charging.
This is where Iontra’s approach fundamentally departs from convention.
Instead of forcing every cell through a predefined charging curve, Iontra focuses on understanding how a specific cell behaves under charge and tailoring the charging strategy accordingly. By using high-resolution voltage and current sensing combined with proprietary algorithms, their system identifies the conditions under which internal degradation mechanisms are likely to occur — and adjusts the charging behavior before damage accumulates.
The result is not a generic charging profile, but a cell-specific charging recipe — one that adapts to the real electrochemical response of the battery rather than relying solely on nominal specifications.
Iontra’s technology spans several implementation levels:
Software-only solutions that can run on existing systems
Optional MCU-based hardware with embedded charging control
DC and AC charging modes, including electrodynamically controlled waveforms superimposed on DC current
In their more advanced configurations, Iontra uses digitally generated AC modulation on top of DC charging to achieve more uniform current distribution inside the cell, reducing hotspots, lithium plating, and uneven SEI growth.
The result is not a single improvement — but a wider performance window:
Faster charging and longer cycle life
Significantly improved cold-weather charging (down to –20 °C)
Higher safety margins
More predictable aging behavior
During CES 2026, Iontra announced several partnerships that made their technology tangible beyond theory.
On the consumer side, they partnered with MAGFAST, applying adaptive charging to a premium power bank. They also announced a collaboration with Salom, one of the leading USB-C power supply manufacturers, where Iontra’s charging methodology is embedded directly into the USB-PD adapter itself.
What stayed with me, however, wasn’t just the product announcements — it was an observation that kept resurfacing in conversations and data:
The biggest performance gains often show up in lower-cost, less-optimized cells.
That raises a provocative question for the industry:
How much effort do we put into manufacturing the perfect cell…
…if intelligent charging can later compensate for variability, quality spread, and cost constraints?
This doesn’t make chemistry or manufacturing excellence irrelevant — far from it.
But it does suggest that charging strategy is an underused lever when it comes to balancing performance, cost, lifetime, and sustainability.
Iontra’s two-day program included excellent technical sessions and discussions with industry partners and academic contributors. One highlight for me was Professor Gregory Plett from the University of Colorado Colorado Springs.
Even after years of working directly on battery aging and degradation mechanisms, I still had several aha moments — not because the fundamentals were new, but because of the clarity with which he explained them. That, to me, is always a sign of deep understanding.
It also reinforced something I strongly believe: we are far from done learning about batteries.
If we consider how charging directly influences electrochemical processes inside the cell — lithium plating, SEI formation, particle stress, current distribution — then charging is not just an operational detail. It is an active participant in how batteries age, fail, or survive.
This naturally connects to formation protocols as well. We are starting to see new, data-driven insights — including AI-supported analyses — suggesting that high-current pulses during formation can, in some cases, be more beneficial than the slow, constant-current approaches the industry has relied on for decades.
I’ve also observed early signals of an industry shift: partially or unformed cells being shipped to integrators, allowing the final formation step to happen closer to the application — where charging strategy, system context, and intellectual property intersect.
All of this points to a broader conclusion.
Battery innovation doesn’t stop at materials selection or cell design. It continues through:
Charging strategy
Formation protocols
System integration
And how intelligently batteries are treated over thousands of cycles
Adaptive charging challenges us to rethink where value is created — not only in the lab, but across the entire battery lifecycle.
And that may be one of the most important shifts we need to make.
-Veronika
May 2025 ✨ Looks like I’m officially an Aurelia Star 🤩 — and I couldn’t be more grateful. This recognition comes through the Aurelia Academy
